Kvale, S. 1997. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal. (19 – 216)
Merrick, E. 1999. An exploration of quality in qualitative research: Are ”reliability” and ”validity” relevant? I: M.
Kopola & L. A. Suzuki (red.) Using qualitative methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks/London/New Dehli: Sage Publications. (25 – 36)
Shank, Gary (2006). Six alternatives to mixed methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology (3), 346-356.
Ulvik, Oddbjørg Skjær (1997). Intervjuer med barn og voksne – hvordan formulere de etiske problemstillingene? Fra Syv artikler om forskningsetikk fra konferansen Grunnleggende verdier og etiske dilemmaer i samfunn og forskning. Norges forskningsråd, Kultur & samfunn. (25-45)
Valsiner, Jaan (1984). Two epistemological frameworks in psychology: The typological and the variational modes of thinking. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 449-470.
Woodhead, Martin & Dorothy Faulkner (2000). Subjects, objects or participants? Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In Christensen, Pia & Allison James (eds.) Research with children, Perspectives and practices. London: Routledge. (9-36)
I tillegg anbefales studentene å hente litteratur fra denne listen:
a) Forskjellige tilnærminger
Alldred, Pam & Erica Burman (2004). Analysing children’s accounts using discourse analysis. I Greene, Sheila & Diane Hogan (eds.), Researching children’s experience. Approaches and methods. London: Sage. (175-199)
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Engil, Susanne (2004). Narrative analysis of children’s experience. . I Greene, Sheila & Diane Hogan (eds.), Researching children’s experience. Approaches and methods. London: Sage. (200-219)
Hennessey, Eilis & Caroline Heary (2004). Exploring children’s views through focus groups. I Greene, Sheila & Diane Hogan (eds.), Researching children’s experience. Approaches and methods. London:Sage. (236-253)
Henwood, Karen & Nick Pidgeon (2003). Grounded theory in Psychological Research. In Camic, P.M., Rhodes, J.E. & Yardley, L. (Eds.): Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (131-157)
Larkin, Michal, Simon Watts and Elizabeth Clifton, (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006 (3), 102-120.
b) Eksempler på kvalitative studier
Gill, Rosalind, Karen Henwood & Carl Mclean (2005). Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body & Society, 11 (1): 37-62.
Gulbrandsen, Mette (2003). Peer relations as arenas for gender constructions among young teenagers. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11 (1), 113-132.
*Haavind, Hanne (2003). Masculinity by rule-breaking. Cultural contestations in the transitional move from being a child to being a young male. NORA, Nordic Journal of Women’s studies 11, 89-100.
Jensen, T. K. (2005). The interpretation of signs of child sexual abuse. Culture & Psychology, 11 (4), 469-498. Pastoor, Lutine de Wal (2005). Discourse and learning in a Norwegian multiethnic classroom: Developing shared understanding through classroom discourse. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20 (1), 13-27.
Saxe, Geoffrey B. (1996) Studying cognitive development in sociocultural context: The development of a practice-based approach. In Emerson, Robert M. (ed.). Contemporary Field research. Perspectives and formulations. Waveland: Waveland Press. (275-304)