Pensum/læringskrav

Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Wiley-Blackwell (kap. 1-6; 9-10)

Tidd & Bessant 2019. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Edition. (kap. 1-2; 5-6; 9)

Nelson, R. & Winter, S.  1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press. (kap. 1) (digitalt tilgjengelig - se Google Scholar)
 

Edquist, Charles 2005. “Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges”, i Fagerberg, Jan, Movery, David C. og Richard R. Nelson (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, s. 181-208

Hughes T., (1987), "The Evolution of Technological Systems", in Bijker et al. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 51 – 82.

Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar 1986 [1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. “Chapter 2” (s. 43-90)

Powell, Walter W. og Stine Grodal 2005. “Networks of Innovators”, i Fagerberg, Jan, Movery, David C. og Richard R. Nelson (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, s. 56-85

Bijker, W.  2010. How is technology made? That is the question. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, 34, 63–76

Fagerberg, Jan (2003): 'Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13 (2),pp 125-59.

Freeman, Christopher (1995): 'The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (1), pp 5-24

Kuhn, T.S. (1977) “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science, Science, Vol. 159, No. 3810 (Jan. 5, 1968), pp. 56-63

Asdal, Kristin 2011. Politikkens natur - naturens politikk. Universitetsforlaget. 304 sider.

Asdal, Brenna og Moser 2007. Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub 350 sider - åpen tilgang

Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes & Yannick Barthe 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. 300 sider.

Collins, Harry & Trevor Pinch (eds.) 1998. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 163 sider. 

Turkle, Sherry 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books. 360 sider.

Kompendium (kjøpes i Kopiutsalget hos Akademika)

Akrich, Madeleine 1992. "The De-Scription of Technical Objects" i Bijker, Wiebe E. og John Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 205-224.

Berg, Anne-Jorunn 1999. ”A gendered socio-technical construction: the smart house” i Donald MacKenzie og Judy Wajcman: The Social Shaping of Technology, Second Edition, Buckingham: Open University Press, s. 301-313.

Foucault, Michel. 2002. "Regjering" i Forelesninger om regjering og styringskunst. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk, s. 39-71.

Haraway, Donna 1991. “Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective” in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge, s. 183-201

Hilgartner, Stephen 2000. «Staging authoritative reports» i Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford University Press, s. 42-70.

Latour, Bruno 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. “Chapter 2” (s. 63-100) og “Chapter 3”, (s. 103-144).

Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar 1986 [1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. “Chapter 2” (s. 43-90)

Mol, Annemarie 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press. “Chapter 1” (s. 1-27) og “Chapter 2” (s. 29-51)

Moser, Ingunn & Thygesen, Hilde 2013. “Velferdsteknologi og teleomsorg: Nye idealer of former for omsorg”, i Tjora, Aksel og Line Melby (red.) Samhandling for helse. Gyldendal Akademisk, s. 144-158.

Oudshoorn, Nelly og Trevor Pinch 2003. “Introduction”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly & Trevor Pinch (red.) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 1-25.

Wyatt, Sally 2003: «Non-Users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor Pinch, How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 67-79.

Digital tilgang (artikler)

Beaulieu, Scharnhorst, Wouters 2007. “Not just another case study: A middle range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of E-science”, I Science, Technology and Human Values, 32(6): 672-692:

Druglitrø, Tone 2012. Å skape en standard for velferd: Forsøksdyr i norsk biovitenskap, 1953-1986. «Kap. 1: Introduksjon» (s.11-22), «Kap. 2: Teoretiske ressurser, metoder og materiale» (s. 23-47), og «Kap. 6: Kyndig stell» (s. 141-167). PhD-avhandling, TIK Senter for Teknologi, Innovasjon og Kultur, Universitetet i Oslo - åpen tilgang

Felt, Ulrike og Maximilian Fochler, 2013. “What science stories do: Rethinking the multiple consequences of intensified science communication” i Baranger, Patrick & Bernard Schiele (red) Science Communication Today. International perspectives, Issues and Strategies. Paris: CNRS Editions, s. 75-90.

Hermansen, Erlend A. T. 2015. "I Will Write a Letter and Change the World: The Knowledge Base Kick-Starting Norway’s Rainforest Initiative", i Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3 (2): 34-46.

Hine, Christine 2007. «Multisited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS». Science, Technology and Human Values, 32(6): 652-71.

Jensen, Casper Bruun 2005: “Citizen projects and consensus building at the Danish Board of Technology: on experiments in democracy”, i Acta Sociologica 48, s. 221-235.

Kuhn, T.S. 1977. “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Latour, Bruno 2004. “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern”, i Critical Inquiry 30, s. 225-248.

Law, John 2007: ANT and material-semiotics

Moser, Ingunn og Thygesen, Hilde 2014. “Prosjekteriets dilemma: Mellom avgrenset prosjekt og muligheter for læring i teleomsorg og velferdsinnovasjon”, i Tidsskrift for forskning i sygdom og samfund, 21, s. 57-75.

Pinch, Trevor and Wiebe E. Bijker 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other”, i Social Studies of Science 14 (3), s. 399-441.

Pols, Jeannette 2012. “Chapter 8: Innovating care innovation», in Care at a Distance. On the closeness technology - open access

Pols, Jeanette 2010. “The heart of the matter. About good nursing and telecare”, i Health Care Analysis18 (4): 374-388.

Ruppert, Evelyn, John Law, Mike Savage 2013. "Reassembling the Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices" in Theory, Culture & Society, 30 (4)pp. 22-46

Winner, Langdon 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109 (1) s. 121-136.

Wyatt, S. (2008): "Technological determinism is dead. Long live technological determinism", i The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3. utgave. MIT press, s. 165-180.

Wynne, Brian 1992. "Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science", i Public Understanding of Science 1(3), s. 281-304.

Wynne, Brian 2010. “Strange Weather, Again. Climate Science as Political Art”, i Theory, Culture & Society 27 (no. 2-3): 289-305.

Anbefalt tilleggslitteratur

Abernathy W. J. & Clark, K.B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction, Research Policy 14: 3-22.

Castellacci, F., Grodal, S., Mendonca, S. & Wibe, M. 2005. Advances and Challenges in Innovation Studies. Journal of Economic Issues 39: 91-121.

Castellacci, F. 2007. Evolutionary and new growth theories: Are they converging? Journal of Economic Surveys 21: 585-627.

Chesbrough, H. W. 2011. The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review Winter 2011: 35-41.

Cohen, M.D. and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128-152.

David, P.A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75:332-337.

Edler, J. & Fagerberg, J. 2017 Innovation policy: what, why, and how, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 33, Number 1, pp. 2-23

Eisenhardt, K. M.1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.

Fagerberg, J.; D. Mowery; and B. Verspagen. 2008. Innovation-systems, path dependency and policy: The co-evolution of science, technology and innovation policy and industrial structure in a small, resource-based economy. In Paper presented in the Prime-Latin America Conference in Mexico City, September 24-26.

Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Verspagen, B. (2009). The evolution of Norway's national innovation system. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 431-44.

Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31:1257-1274.

Geels, F.W. & Schot, J. 2007 Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Research Policy, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp. 399-417

Hartley, J. 2005. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money and Management 25:27-34.

Jensen, M.B.; B. Johnson; E. Lorenz; and B.Å. Lundvall. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36:680-693.

Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy - Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, ed. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg. Washington: National Academy Press.

March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2:71-87.

Martin, B.R. 2015. Twenty Challenges for Innovation Studies. SPRU Working Paper Series SWPS 2015-30 (November), SPRU Science Policy Research Unit / University of Sussex.

Mazzucato, M. 2018. Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change 5:803-815.

Nelson, R.R. 2011. The Moon and the Ghetto revisited. Science and Public Policy 38:681-690.

OECD. 2017. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Norway 2017. In OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy. OECD Publishing, Paris.

Powell, W.W.; K.W. Koput; and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly:116-145.

Schot, J. and W.E. Steinmueller. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47:1554-1567.

Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21: 1147-1161.

Tushman, M.L. and C.A. O'Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38.

Van de Ven, Andrew H. (2017) The innovation journey: you can't control it, but you can learn to maneuver it, Innovation, 19:1, 39-42